19 August 2022
< 1 min read
Civil Society Forum outlined four priorities in meeting with President
25 July 2022
3 min read
Guyana’s electoral system under “stranglehold” of a few
4 July 2022
< 1 min read
Electoral Reform Group condemns East Coast looting
26 June 2022
2 min read
A review of the 2020 elections is warranted and one expects GECOM to lead the process.
19 May 2022
2 min read
Allow Civil Society and GECOM to roll out consultations on Guyana’s first genuine referendum on electoral reform
15 May 2022
3 min read
Civil society group believes probe into 2020 elections necessary for proper reform
6 January 2022
2 min read
Press Release- 6th January, 2022
3 January 2022
5 min read
Electoral Reform Group says splitting up Region 4 is unjustified, provocative.
20 December 2021
2 min read
ERG will work with all interested citizens in 2021 to lay ground for election we can be proud of in 2025
5 December 2021
2 min read
Press Release- 5th December, 2021
2 December 2021
3 min read
The current draft ROPA amendments reflect only the interest of government and the PPP/C
28 November 2021
5 min read
Reform group calls for ‘simplifying’ of proposed elections law amendments.
20 November 2021
3 min read
Electoral Reform Group says Guyanese need more time for reform process
14 November 2021
2 min read
The draft amendment essentially entrenches a bad electoral system
1 November 2021
2 min read
Press Release- 1st November, 2021
30 May 2021
2 min read
The work of the ERG is to give citizens the opportunity to choose our electoral system
28 May 2021
2 min read
Guyana needs a broad-based mechanism to drive national consensus on electoralreforms
18 January 2021
2 min read
All stakeholders should be involved from inception of electoral reform process
20 December 2020
5 min read
Electoral Reform
12 December 2020
3 min read
We see electoral reform as entry point to broader reforms

A review of the 2020 elections is warranted and one expects GECOM to lead the process.

This was published as a letter to the editor in the Stabroek News on 26th June, 2022.

The recent announcements about the proposed General and Regional Elections Commission of Inquiry cast a shadow of doubt over the process. On the one hand, we have the announcements by the Government of the CoI prompted by the attempted rigging of the elections in 2020. On the other hand, we have the decision of the GECOM Chair that GECOM should not undertake an independent review of the elections.

The decision of the GECOM Chair is a curious one that raises questions about the Commission itself. Does the Chair have the power to overrule the other GECOM members? Or is the Chair’s action a way of letting GECOM partisan members off the hook for their positions and acceding to Government leading the process? As has been clear for so long, the way GECOM is constructed and functions needs thorough review and reform.

Unquestionably, a thorough review of the 2020 elections is warranted, and one would expect that GECOM, as presumably the independent elections authority in the country, is the proper agency to have a leading role in the process. What is the good of GECOM if it cannot be expected to do this? The stage is now set for the usual political ‘wrangling and tangling’ (my late mother’s expression) over the inquiry which could be avoided by GECOM taking charge.

It must be stressed that this CoI must not be too narrowly focused. It is not enough for the conclusions to be a vindication of the claims of one party about winning the elections or the skullduggery that took place. All that is now in the past and matters are before the courts. It is for the courts to do their job and decide those matters. This CoI must be forward-looking.

As recent studies have indicated, a large part of the Guyanese population does not have confidence in the fairness and reliability of our elections. The most important task of the CoI is to stop loopholes that make fraud possible and strengthen the credibility of our elections. If the CoI can achieve this, it will make a solid contribution to the stability and progress of this country.

As things stand, we now await the details of the terms of reference. We have had many CoIs over the years but it is hard to put a finger on any concrete outcomes from them. General elections are a serious matter and the Guyanese public has a right to expect an intense investigation that produces concrete, actionable results. We await the details of the terms of reference and hope the Government authorities will be responsive to the interests of the public in this regard.

Sincerely,

Desmond Thomas